Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Washbourn / Re: Washbourn
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 22, 2019, 05:10:15 am »
Your ancestor John's sister Ann actually married Wm Spackman who flipped his name to Casswell after he inherited his father Robert's large estate.  It's a long but fascinating story!  :-)

52
Caswell / The Domesday Book and Wiltshire villages Caswells lived in.
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 21, 2019, 10:19:34 am »
Extracts from the Domesday Book
relevant to the villages inhabited by Caswells in Wiltshire
c 1066 ad

The land of Osbern Gifford
Osbern himself hold KELLAWAYS. Donna held it in TRE and it paid geld for 10 hides. There is land for 6 ploughs. Of this 9 hides are in demesne, and there are 3 ploughs and 4 slaves, and 2 villans and 4 corsets and 3 borders with 3 ploughs. There are 10 acres of meadows. It was worth 4 pounds, now 100/-

Ansfrid holds BECKHAMPTON of Gilbert. Eadric held in TRE and it paid geld for 2 hides. There is land for ploughs. Of this 1 hide is in demesne, and there are 2 ploughs. Of this 1 hide is in demesne. and there are 2 ploughs, and 4 villans and 7 borders and 3 cottars with 2 ploughs. There are 8 acres of meadow and 40 acres of pasture. it was and is worth 6 pounds.

Robert hold HILMARTON of Ernulf. Eskil held it in TRE and it paid geld for 1 hide. There is land for 1 plough, which (plough) is there, with 3 corsets. There i s a mill rendering 7/6 and 6 acres of meadow, and 1 acre of pasture, and 8 acres of woodland. it was worth 15/- now 30/-

Borel holds (E or W) Tytherton. Attic held it in TRE and it paid geld for 2 hides. There is land for 1 plough which (plough) is there, and 2 slaves, and 3 cotsets. There is the 4th part of a mill  rendering 20d and 6 acres of meadow. It was worth 10/- now 20/-

Edward the Sherrif has yearly the pence which belong to the shrievalty, 130 pigs and 32 sides of bacon of wheat, 2 motif and 8 sesters, and as much malt, of oats, 5 motif and 4 sesters, of honey, 16 sesters, or instead of honey 16/-,180 hens, 1600 eggs, 100 cheeses, 52 lambs, 240 fleeces of corn in the field 162 acres. He has also 80 pounds in value between the reeve land and what he has from it.When the reeve's farm falls short, Edward must make it up from his own resources.

Edward of Salisbury (above) held the following Wilcot, Alton Barnes, Etchilhampton, Heddington, Highworth, Ratfyn, Shrewton, Winterborn Stoke Orcheston North Tidworth, Ludgershall, Amesbury Hill Deverill Bradenstoke Chitterne, Buyton Bishopstrow, Middleton, Lacock, Rockley, Winterborne Earls

The church itself holds Bremhill TRE it paid geld for 38 hides. There is land for 30 ploughs. 0f this land 17 hides are in demesne, and there are 7 ploughs, and 12 slaves There are 32 villans and 13 bordars with 20 ploughs. There are 2 mills rendering 30/- and 12 acres of meadow, and woodland 2 leagues long and 2 furlongs broad. It was worth 14 pounds when the abbot received it, now 16 pounds.






The Domesday Book on Yatesbury

Here is what the famous Domesday Books says about our village:-

Etesburie, Owner = ALWI, tenant = Alured of Spain, Parish = 1600 acres

Alured of Spain holds Etesburie of the King. Alwi held it in the time of King Edward & it paid geld for 5 hides. The land is 4 caracutes. Of this there are 3 1/2 hides in demesne, and there are 2 caracutes & 2 serfs: & there are 7 bordars, & one 'miles' with 1 caracute. There are 20 acres of pasture, it was worth 3 pounds, it is now worth 4 pounds.

A caracute was the amount of land that could be ploughed in a year by 1 plough and 8 oxen.

A hide was generally defined the same way, or as 100 acres.

Land in demesne, was land held directly by the lord, or not held by a sub tenant. The 'Home Farm' of later times.

Extracts from the Domesday book from Devonshire

The King holds Kingskerswell TRE it paid geld for 1.5 hides. There is land for 17 ploughs. In demesne is 1 slough, and 3 slaves, and 16 villans, and 33 bordars with 16 ploughs. There are 9 acres of meadow and 20 acres of woodland. It renders 14 pounds (stirling) by weight. There is halt a virgate of land in (the hand's of) this manor's church.

The Church itself holds Abbotskerswell. TRE it paid geld for 1.5 hides. There is land for 8 ploughs In demesne are 2 ploughs, and 2 slaves, and 10 villans and 9 borders with 4 ploughs. There are 12 acres of meadow, pasture 5 furlongs in length and 30 acres in breadth, Andy woodland 12 furlongs in both length and breadth. It is worth 40s.

53
CaSSwell / Follow the money 4
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 20, 2019, 07:15:08 pm »
FOLLOW THE MONEY 4


Now, we turn our attention to another money trail coming into the descendants of Richard Casswell of Trowbridge, those who descend from Henry Slade and his mistress/wife Susanna Gunstone.

The will of Henry Slade of Hilperton.

By this my last will and Testament made this twenty fifth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty one I Henry Slade of Hilperton Marsh within the parish of Hilperton in the county of Wilts Gentleman do give and dispose of my worldly goods estate and effects in manner following that is to say In the first place I give unto my sons James Stephen and William Slade the sum of twenty pounds each.

Also I give unto my daughters Eleanor, Ann, Lydia and Jane the sum of twenty pounds each and to my daughter Grace the sum of ten pounds which several legacys before mentioned I direct shall be paid them by my executrix herinafter named in twelve months after my decease but in any case any or either of my said sons or daughters shall happen to dye before his her legacy or legacys shall become due or payable then I direct and it is my will that the legacy or  legacys of him her or them dying shall go and be paid unto and equally amongst the survivors of them.

Also I give devise and bequeath unto my loving wife Susannah all my freehold and Leasehold Estate of what nature or kind soever and wheresoever situate and being and whereof I shall dye seized or possessed either in possession or Reversion for and during her natural life and from and after her decease I give and devise and bequeath the same and every part thereof unto Henry Slade Gunstone his heirs and assigns for ever in case he shall be then living, but in case he shall happen to die in the lifetime of my said wife I then give devise and bequeath the same from the death of my said wife unto Lucretia Gunstone  her Heirs and assigns forever.

Also I give unto Lucretia Gunstone the sum of five hundred pounds in case the said Henry Slade Gunstone her brother shall happen to survive my said wife and be possessed of my aforesaid freehold and leasehold estates which sum  I direct shall be by him paid unto her in one year next after his so coming into the possession thereof and I do hereby charge and make subject my said freehold and leasehold estates with the payment thereof and lastly all the rest residue and remainder of my goods chattles estate and effects whereof I shall dye seized or possessed and not hereinbefore given or disposed of I give devise and bequeath the same and every part therof after payment of my debts legacys and funeral expenses unto my loving wife Susannah and to her heirs **** **** and assigns respectively.
And I do hereby constitute and appoint my said wife Susannah sole Executrix of this my last will and testament hereby revoking all former wills by me at any time heretofore made, And I do hereby devise my wife do bury me at Hilperton in the same Grave where my late father is interred.

In witness whereof I have to this my last will and testament containing two sheets of paper to the first whereof I have set my hand and to the last set my hand and seal the day and year within written

Henry Slade

Henry Slade was a wise man who cleverly manipulated the system to protect those he loved and to get what he wanted, without causing disgrace and upset to his family.

As you can see from his will, he had several children by his legal wife Ann, but he also named two other people (Henry Slade Gunstone & Lucretia Gunstone) in his will, giving them virtually all of his estate, whilst he gave all his other children 20 pounds, except Grace, who only received 10 pounds. Obviously she must have irritated Henry somehow.

Only 2 months after the death of his wife Ann, Henry marries Susannah Gunstone, a spinster. This seems a little fast for the period and Henry was 75 years old, which also seems to be unusual, but he had his reasons.

I checked everywhere to find the baptismal records of Lucretia Gunstone and/or Lucretia Gunstone Slade, to no avail. I also did the same for Henry Gunstone Slade and Henry Slade Gunstone. There are no records for these people because they were never baptised. This was Henry's clever move, because there was then no obvious written record that they were the illegitimate children of him and Susannah Gunstone.

As soon as Henry married Susannah Gunstone, albeit in his twilight years, he legitamatized his two children. They were able to ‘flip' their names around, Henry Slade Gunstone became Henry Gunstone Slade and Lucretia Gunstone became Lucretia Gunstone Slade.

This name switching caused me months of grief trying to track down all these Gunstone Slades. Henry led me a merry dance!

What was particularly confusing for me initially was the marriage certificate of Henry Gunstone Slade. He was entered as Henry Slade, but signed himself Henry Slade Gunstone. He was also named this way in his father's will . I found it incredibly hard to think that there was another person in the area named Henry Gunstone Slade, and of course there was not. Henry was 'legitimately' able to 'flip' his name around once his father married Susannah Gunstone. When he was left the entire estate, at the expense of his half brothers and sisters, I can only imagine him feeling that there was some poetic justice in the world, perhaps compensation for all the 'father's bastard son' comments.

Our new 'respectable' Henry Gunstone Slade, man of property and money , went off in search of a wife. He found Mary Casswell, daughter of the wealthy gentleman of Trowbridge, Richard Casswell. The perfect match for a young man with every thing to look forward to.

Old Henry did a marvelous thing, he recognised his mistress by marrying her as soon as he was able, he honored his wife, staying with her 'til she died, and he legitamized' his baseborn children. Its no wonder he was titled - gentleman!

The Gunstone Slade name carries forward for several generations, and so old Henry was honored by his descendants long after his decease, a most fitting tribute!


54
CaSSwell / Follow the money 3
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 20, 2019, 07:14:23 pm »
FOLLOW THE MONEY 3

It’s 1763 in Yatesbury and William (Spackman) Casswell, at the age of  21, marries Ann Washbourn, a 24 year old, daughter of John Washbourn and Anne Merrimouth.

His tomb is by the front door of the church in Yatesbury, along with a Washbourn tomb. Inscribed here is William’ date of birth, confirming the same date as the baptism record of William Spackman in the burial records. The tomb was cleaned by Michael Caswell c 1995. William's illegitimate birth was intentionally hidden in the church records. It was put at the bottom of a page, out of sequence, so was recorded as required by law, yet almost impossible to trace in practice. [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

He’s wealthy, incredibly wealthy, having inherited his grand father’ WIlliam’s fortune, which was passed to his father Robert.

This caused a rift in the family between  Robert’s siblings, Christian Pope, William (Mary Young), Susannah Viveash, Mary Pottow.

Wm (Spackman) Casswell was the illegitimate son of Robert Caswell and Elizabeth Spackman. No one knows exactly when his name was flipped from Spackman (on his birth registration) to Caswell, but it was quite common to flip the names after an inheritance.

William (Spackman) Casswell and Ann Washbourn have two children in their short lives.
Mary Casswell born. ?    and Robert christened 29 Apr 1764 in Yatesbury.

Robert never married and as his mother was the sole beneficiary of the Casswell estates, she leaves everything to son Robert after securing her daughters future.

The Will of Ann (Washbourn) CASSWELL

Copy from the Public Record Office, London.  PROB 11/1003

Ann Casswell of Yatesbury in the County of Wilts being of sound mind memory
and understanding to make my last will in manner following,that is to say,
********  I have given bond to my brother Thomas Washborn and George Brown
for the payment of three hundred pounds to my daughter Mary Caswell otherwise
Washborn at her age and manner herein ****** and it is my directions to make
further provisions for her also hereforth.
I give unto my brother Thomas Washborn and George Brown two hundred pounds more in trust that they do apply both interest and principal Foy***  sure in like in as much as **here forth
in the*oudafows* as by having interest thereto will more fully appear all
the residue of my effects *** to my son Robert Caswell but my will is that
if my son should happen to die in his minority and before my daughter then
I give the whole of my effects to my daughter aforesaid and my will further
is that if both my said children should happen to die before their respective
ages of eighteen years ***leaving no ***lawf**  ****that these my effects
*** be equally divided between such of my brothers and sisters as shall be
living and I nominate and designate my brother Thomas Washborn and George
Brown my executors in trust in witness hereof, I have herunto set my hand
and seal to this my last will and testament the seventeenth day of April
one thousand seven hundred and sixty one.

Ann Casswell



Robert’s will states -

To John Washbourne of Yatesbury, William Brown of Broad Hinton and Thomas
Chandler of Yeytesbury my freehold manor and reported ****,messuages , farm,
lands, etc in Rodbourne Cheney, Wilts to hold etc for the use for life of my niece Ann the wife of Francis Stephen Long of Boreham. Upon trust and after her decease to the use of Robert Caswell Long second son of my said niece. To trustees further 6000 pounds interest of which for the use of Susannah, wife of George John Bannister of Warminster, banker, another niece and aftds for her second son.residue for children of two nieces.

The actual will can be read here!

https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/5111/40611_310354-00134?pid=750707&backurl=https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?_phsrc%3DNiV6776%26_phstart%3DsuccessSource%26usePUBJs%3Dtrue%26indiv%3D1%26dbid%3D5111%26gsln%3Dcaswell%26gsfn_x%3D1%26gsln_x%3D1%26new%3D1%26rank%3D1%26uidh%3Dmfw%26redir%3Dfalse%26gss%3Dangs-d%26pcat%3D36%26fh%3D22%26h%3D750707%26recoff%3D%26fsk%3DMDsxOTsyMA-61--61-%26bsk%3D%26pgoff%3D%26ml_rpos%3D23%26queryId%3D35fc141bbb75f0eada502c7816109943&treeid=&personid=&hintid=&queryId=35fc141bbb75f0eada502c7816109943&usePUB=true&_phsrc=NiV6776&_phstart=successSource&usePUBJs=true&_ga=2.217282518.1777351004.1592501290-826492234.1566769744


In memory of this gift the sisters erect this memorial in the Yatesbury church.





The nieces mentioned here are the daughters of John Washbourn  and Susannah Walters of Yatesbury.

But! We must remember John Washbourn’s will, where he makes Thomas Washbourn and Robert Casswell trustees of 600 pounds for his two daughters Ann and Susannah. It look like Robert did a good job of that and added his own inheritance to it, making the total of six thousand pound to these two ladies. It is no wonder the Longs are farming over 3600 acres of downs.

Ann (Walters) Washbourn born 28 Feb 1780  marries Francis Stephen Long (2nd) and moves to Boreham Farm Warminster.

Ann is the main benefactor of the Casswell fortune, and this first becomes evident by the 1851 census for Bulford, where her grandson, who marries Elizabeth Sophia Coates, names their second child, Mary Caswell Long, born 6 Apr 1850

The census states ‘Farming 1600 acres, employing 57 laborers, nurses, cooks and more.”


Obviously, this is a massive operation, and on some really good sheep rearing land.
 So far, it has not been possible to see the outcome of this venture. More research needed.

Ann (Walters) Washbourn and 2nd Francis Stephen Long had a son Robert Caswell Long, and they live in West Overton. From the 1851 census we see he is farming some 2000 acres of prime Wiltshire Downs and employing 80 men. There seems to be no issue here nor a marriage, so we have to wonder what happened to this fortune.

Susannah Washbourn, daughter of John and Susanna Walters, marries George John Bannister and they live in Warminster.. George is a wealthy banker there. They have six children and their fourth son is named John Caswell Bannister.

Richard Washbourn born 25 Sep 1776 in Yatesbury to John and Susanna Walters Washbourn, was according to the 1851 census for Caterham, Surrey, showing Richard as a farmer, 74 years old, 2 house servants, Wm Poutin 35 and Elizabeth Batter. Richard was born in Yatesbury. He was farming 85 acres, with 17 servants.

The Washbourns of Yatesbury descendants, namely William Everley Washbourn (b. 1819,
         in England); emigrated to New Zealand 1852.
Their activities are recorded on this site.

https://rogerw4.wixsite.com/washbourn/descendancy

In view of the family’s massive involvement in sheep rearing in Wiltshire, one can only surmise they realized the enormous potential of applying their expertise in this new country.  New Zealand Lamb was a favorite for over a hundred years in England.

55
CaSSwell / Follow the money 2
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 20, 2019, 07:13:22 pm »
FOLLOW THE MONEY 2

Our first continuous connection to money is with Robert Casswell  1568-1626 of Yatesbury. He was married to Marie Chilfester.
In his will, he leaves five pounds to the poor, (a sure sign that he wasn’t poor) and five pounds each to his five children. This may not seem like much money today, but at the time a gentleman could almost live for a year or on this. He also left a wheat field to his son Richard, so he was farming freehold, a yeoman. John (A captain, maybe of a ship traveling to the New World) was left a horse.

John’s son Richard  born abt 1660 was married to Mary Flower, another yeoman family in the area. His son Richard born 1683 in Cherhill - died 1730 Rowde, marries Hester Pope, and this is where the split off to the wealthy Trowbridge branch occurs.
Richard Caswell  1735-1809 is a wealthy merchant in the Town. He and his line amass several farms and properties around the town and in Westbury.
James Casswell and Susanna Gunstone Slade (Of the wealthy Slade family from Hilperton)  Have several children, Susannah Gunstone Caswell, (Utica NY), Albert (Brockport Canada) Edwin (Woodstock Canada) and Joshua Gibbs Caswell (Gloucester).

John (The Captain) has another son, John who marries  Elizabeth Flower of Cherhill, and they have several children. One, Edmund inherits an ‘estate’ in Bishops Cannings, but there is no evidence of any further activity from Edmund other than his marriage, and the will states the property will pass to Richard, which we can only assume  this occurs,  Some wealth seems to transfer to Richard of Rowde.

Another son of John The Captain is Thomas who marries Elizabeth.  He leaves a freehold estate  and ‘purtanences’ in Tytherton Kellaways to his wife, with the proviso everything  passes to - John Caswell Timothy Caswell Thomas Caswell and James Caswell ‘share and share alike’. We can only assume this occurs. Timothy marries Jane Wakefield and produces a prolific line of blacksmiths and bakers around Avebury and the Ogbournes, but there never is a large transfer of property or cash thereafter.

John The Captain’s other son Henry produces a son William, who marries Catherine Burchell

William is extremely wealthy owning numerous properties, as can be seen by the dispute  forthcoming on his demise.  THE DISPUTE OF WILLIAM CASSWELL'S ESTATE.

 William and Catherine have Robert Casswell who was born in June 1704 in Bremhill,

Robert was one of five siblings. He married Judith Hughes in April 1731 At Salisbury. There was never any account of any children so we can assume Judith was infertile for some reason.
Robert, being a wealthy man, a yeoman with real estate, needed an heir.  He waited ten years for a child, but none was forthcoming.

Elizabeth Spackman, from good local stock, her father also a yeoman with copyhold estates in Cherhill, had an obviously illegitimate son. Hidden from view, in the burial register for Cherhill 1741, we find the baptism of William Spackman, son of Elizabeth, born on May the 13th.

The previous record to William was the burial of a Robert Bradfield, buried on July 13th 1740. It looks like this was a deliberate attempt to hide the record and the registrar found this neat little space to carry out his official duty, without bringing this obviously illegitimate birth to everyone’s attention. I can imagine the baptism being a private affair, with just the parent’s present.
How do we know Robert Casswell was the father? We simply need to read his will.

In the name of God Amen I Robert Caswell of Yatesbury in the County of Wilts yeoman being weak in Body but of sound Mind Memory and Understanding
(thanks be unto God) Do make this my last will-and Testament in manner following That is to say First my Will is that my just debts and Funeral Expenses shall be paid by my Executors in Trust heron after named,

item 1 give unto my Brother in Law William Vivaish one Shilling,
item unto my Sister Christian Pope One Shilling,
item I give to my Sister Mary Pottow One Shilling
item I Give and bequeath unto Elizabeth Spackman Spinster Daughter of William Spackman of Cherhill in the said County One Hundred Pounds to be paid her in one year after my Decease, also one Feather Bead with all the Bedding whereunto belonging

item I Give unto my Loving Wife Judith Caswell one half part or Moiety of all my Household Goods for and during her natural life. and after her decease I give the said half part or Moiety of my Household Goods to William Spackman Son of the Said Elizabeth Spackman  above mentioned  Also I Give unto my said Wife Judith one annuity of Twenty Pounds a year to be paid her Quarterly (to begin and commence immediately after my Decease) by my Executors in Trust heron after named For the Term of Four Years if She should so long happen to live and from and after the term of the Said four years, my will is that in lieu therof She shall have  and accept of the one half part or Moiety of the lnterest of my whole Estate being placed at interest after the payment of my Debts Legacy's and Expenses that may accrue in the execution of this my last will by Executors in Trust hereinafter named

item I give unto the said William Spackman son of the said Elizabeth Spackman one Annuity of Twenty pounds a year to be paid out Quarterly (to begin and Commence immediately after my decease) by my executors in Trust heron after named for the term of Four Years, For the maintenance and Education of the said William Spackman, and from and after the said Term of four years My Will is that in lieu thereof my Executors shall take the other half part or moiety of the interest of my whole Estate being placed out at interest as above said and apply the same for the use and Benefitt of the said William Spackman at their discretion, and my will and meaning further is that after my Wifes Decease the whole of my Estate both Real and personal shall be and remain in the Hands of my said Executors in Trust or the Survivor or Survivors of them until the said William Spackman shall arrive to the age of one and twenty years And then my will is that my said executors in trust shall Deliver up (after deducting their necessary charges) all my Estate and Securities to the said William Spackman for his own proper use But if the said William Spackman should marry and Die & leave a child or Children before he shall attain to the age of one and twenty years my Will is that my Executors or the survivor of them shall equally divide my said whole Estate amongst such Children and lastly I do hereby nominate constitute and appoint my Friends Thomas Neate of Calne, Thomas Naider of Monckton, Thomas Brown of Nevertown and Stephen Neate of Upham all in the said County of Wilts my whole and whole and sole Executors in trust of this my last Will and Testament ( and further I give and bequeath unto each of them my said Executors in Trust of the sum of Five Pounds for Executing the Trust herein by me reposed in them and further my Will is that neither of my executors shall be answerable for each other nor accountable for any monies that shall be lost by being placed out at interest) 

And I do hereby revoke Disannul and make void all Former Wills and do declare this to be my last Will and Testament. in Witness whereof I have herunto set my hand and Seal the Fifteenth Day of June in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty One

Signed Sealed published and Declared by the said Robert Caswell to be his last Will & Testament signed Henry Palmer Isaac Paradise

The first part of the will holds fairly standard way of ensuring there is no contest to the will by gifting a small amount of money to certain relatives, hence the shilling offered to his brother in law, who married his sister Susanna, and sisters Christian and Mary.

Next, he does the right thing and provides a comfortable living for his wife Judith. Then, the feathers fly - literally!

Item I Give and bequeath unto Elizabeth Spackman Spinster Daughter of William Spackman of Cherhill in the said County One Hundred Pounds to be paid her in one year after my Decease, also one Feather Bead with all the Bedding whereunto belonging.

The feather bed? He leaves his mistress his feather bed? Surely, this cannot be where Elizabeth Spackman was bedded? Methinks ’tis so!

Obviously, there is a lot of family hate here, and so we wonder why. Robert was not about to let his considerable wealth get into the hands of his three sisters. He sired a son, and made very sure the boy got everything, while also looking after his wife. He obviously loved her, even though she wasn’t bearing his children.

We don’t have to look far into the past to see where Robert’s wealth came from, his father William of Cherhill, was a church warden and a yeoman.

Catherine (Burchell), Robert’s mother, died. 23 Feb 1704 perhaps in the birth of Robert,  because Robert was christened  25 Jun 1704.

The money came from William’s father, and it looks like his siblings contested the will, the inventory, and even old William’s new wife, Priscilla.

I have been unable to find the marriage of William senior to Priscilla, but she is called his widow in the Estate dispute (See link) and she raised his young family.  It is Susanna, Christian and Mary, who are involved in this incredible battle, and that is no doubt why they only got a shilling each from Robert, and his illegitimate son William Spackman received everything.

The proof that William Spackman, illegitimate son of Elizabeth Spackman is also supported by the inscription on the impressive tomb close to the entrance of the Yatesbury church.
The monumental inscriptions for this tomb of William states,
"Wm. Casswell died 25 9 1765 aged 24” That would have meant he was born in 1741, the same year Elizabeth Spackman gave birth to her William. I had another William incorrectly entered in my files, one born in 1735 to different parents. That has now been corrected with this new evidence of the recent discovery concealed in the burial records.

Let's now look at Williams very short life. He died when he was 24 years old. Here is a young man, a millionaire by todays standards, incredible wealth, and he’s cut short?  Was it an accident? Fell off a horse, got a virus?

Obviously there was a lot of animosity going on with his half siblings. They were fighting tooth and nail to get their hands on his estate. Deception, fraud, skullduggery? All this seemed to be going on according the The Dispute filed
15 May 1722.  To the Right Honourable Thomas Lord Parker Earl of
Macclesfield Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain

Did this war escalate? Could William (Spackman) Casswell have met his untimely end by foul play? Murder even? 



56
CaSSwell / Follow the Money. START HERE!!!
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 20, 2019, 07:12:28 pm »
Follow the money.

It would be a little optimistic to think that the Wiltshire Caswell family descended from Cassivellaunus, (Cassi) the British Celtic Warlord who tackled Julius Caesar on his invasion of Britain. But we can be fairly sure Cassi roamed the Wiltshire Downs, it being such an important place worthy of the burial of Celtic Kings.

Who is to say Cassivellaunus  didn’t know about the Caswell Castle site in Curbridge near Witney? A site where there is a fresh water spring, and watercress growing in the ancient pond that fed the moat.

Is this why Cassivellaunus was so named? He who lived by watercress and a well? 
One thing is for sure, there are remnants of a castle wall, a moat, and a spring, and the site was abandoned, according to the Domesday Book, in 1088.

In the 12th century, Hugh de Caswell and Idonea his wife lived in Yatesbury and held 1 messuage and 14 acres of land there. (Wiltshire Record Society Vol 1 1939). He was obviously a moneyed man, and likely raising sheep.


https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/oxon/vol14/pp202-206#fnn26
The two fees descended separately until the mid 15th century. In 1279, although the earl of Cornwall's intermediate tenure was not mentioned, his fee was presumably the 6 yardlands held of the bishop of Winchester by Hugh de Scotthorne. (fn. 26) Since one of Hugh's yardlands was held of him by the rector of Witney, he was probably the successor of the Roger of Caswell from whom an earlier rector held a yardland by military service in 1229. (fn. 27) In the earlier 14th century the bishop's immediate tenant was another Roger of Caswell, and in 1346 the ⅓ fee was held by the guardian of Roger's minor son and heir John.
It would be easy to surmise that Hugh De Scotthorne was renamed Hugh de Caswell when he acquired the property. Especially interestingly, note the mention of the rectors, of Witney having influence here.

If he was the successor of Roger of Caswell, could that imply parentage? Would the line therefore look like this?

Roger de Caswell
Roger de Caswell
John de Caswell
Hugh de Caswell

Hugh was married in Ayston, Rutland, some 100 miles away, to Idonea on 6th December 1296. How do we know this?
It’s written up in an entry in the Wiltshire record Society Vol 1 (1939)
Abstracts of Feet of Fines relating to Wiltshire for the Reigns of Edward I & Edward II, ed R B Pugh. 14 Edward I (1286) Morrow of Ascension.

To travel a hundred miles across England in the 12th century, would seem to be a monumental task, but these people were traveling along a prehistoric path dinosaurs used.  There is even a Roman road traveling that route, Witney was a major attraction for trade in those days.

See https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.0031-0239.2004.00366.x

Romans and Celts used the same path of the Fosse way, so this was a well traveled  and known route.
Our first hint of The Money Trail is that Hugh De Caswell held One Messuage and 14 acres of land in Yatesbury. A messuage is-a  dwelling house together with its outbuildings, curtilage, and the adjacent land appropriated to its use. 

Abstracts of Wiltshire Inquisitiones Post Mortem. Returned Into the Court of Chancery, page 376 Wiltshire. - Hugh de Careswell holds in Hyatesbury 16 acres of land for the term of his life which he had of the demesne and grant of the said Matthew son of John before he enfeoffed the said King Edward, and he pays therefor per annum 10s. to Thomas Avary at the feast of St Michael.

In English law, feoffment was a transfer of land or property that gave the new holder the right to sell it as well as the right to pass it on to his heirs as an inheritance. It was total relinquishment and transfer of all rights of ownership of an estate in land from one individual to another person.[

About thirty miles, as the crow flies from Yatesbury, Caswell Castle is easily recognized by the pentagonal moat surrounding the site.

In a tax list of 1332 William Caswelle paid a tax of five shillings and four pence, and John Caswell paid six shillings and eight pence, recorded in the Edington Cartulary.

The Church of St Mary’s has a Chantry named after the Wenman family, but it was originally called Caswell Chantry. The Wenmans took possession of Caswell Castle and farm in the 1500s, so it would be reasonable to think they changed the name of the chancel, being wealthy cloth traders in the town.

The south transept aisle, perhaps already associated with owners of Caswell House in Curbridge, was remodeled about 1485, when the wealthy woolman Thomas Fermor or Ricards, of Caswell, left £20 towards the building of the aisle of St Mary Magdalen called [the] Carsewell Ile'

We discovered that William De Caswelle was the rector of St Marys Witney in 1317. Apparently, rectors were wealthy people, owners of manors (Caswell Castle or the manor at Yatesbury?), but likely to appoint a minion to run the day to day church business, while they were off somewhere making lots of money. The only record to be found is our William de  Caswell, farming on the Wiltshire Downs in Yatesbury, where some of the best sheep grazing was available. He would likely have a close connection to Witney, selling large quantities of wool for the thriving blanket weaving industry the town was famous for.

Robert Casswell’s will, dated 1626 in Yatesbury, states he gave five pounds to the poor of the village. He gave 5 pounds to each of his children and a ‘wheat field’, and a horse to his son ‘John the Captain’.  Obviously, the man was very well heeled.

THE WILL OF ROBERT CASWELL 1820
Noted at Marshalls' War*

Robert Caswell of Yatesbury

To John Washbourne of Yatesbury, William Brown of Broad Hinton and Thomas
Chandler of Heytesbury my freehold manor and reported ****,messuages , farm,
lands, etc in Rodbourne Cheney, Wilts to hold etc for the use for life of my niece Ann the wife of Francis Stephen Long of Boreham. Upon trust and after her decease to the use of Robert Caswell Long second son of my said niece. To trustees further 6000 pounds interest of which for the use of Susannah, wife of George John Bannister of Warminster, banker, another niece and aftds for her second son.residue for children of two nieces.

Signed 19 May 1819
Proved PCC 22 Oct 1820

Record found in the Everett Papers (Wills 1) Devizes Museum.

Inside the Yatesbury church on a plaque made by Harrisons of Devizes , under the bell tower:-
'To the memory of Robert Caswell, who died 18th June 1819 aged 55 years - by his nieces Anne LONG and Susanna BANNISTER".
At this time 30 pounds per annum was a good allowance for a gentleman , so 6000 pounds would be worth approx 300,000 pounds in 1996. A very tidy sum!



57
Slade / Henry Slade of Hilperton c 1707 - 1783
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 20, 2019, 08:29:26 am »
Henry married Ann Cogshill in Hilperton on 28 Oct 1730 in North Bradley.  Ann was buried in Hilperton 3 Mar 1780
Henry then married Susanna Gunstone 4 May 1780 in Hilperton. Susanna's children then flipped their names
Henry Slade Gunstone became Henry Gunstone Slade and Susanna Slade Gunstone became Susanna Gunstone Slade. It must then be obvious that Susanna Gunstone was Henry Snr's mistress.

Henry Slade was a wise man who cleverly manipulated the system to protect those he loved and to get what he wanted, without causing disgrace and upset to his family.

As you can see from his will, he had several children by his legal wife Ann, but he also named two other people (Henry Slade Gunstone & Lucretia Gunstone) in his will, giving them virtually all of his estate, whilst he gave all his other children 20 pounds, except Grace, who only received 10 pounds. Obviously she must have irritated Henry somehow.

Only 2 months after the death of his wife Ann, Henry marries Susannah Gunstone, a spinster. This seems a little fast for the period and Henry was 75 years old, which also seems to be unusual, but he had his reasons.

I checked everywhere to find the baptismal records of Lucretia Gunstone and/or Lucretia Gunstone Slade, to no avail. I also did the same for Henry Gunstone Slade and Henry Slade Gunstone. There are no records for these people because they were never baptised. This was Henry's clever move, because there was then no obvious written record that they were the illegitimate children of him and Susannah Gunstone.

As soon as Henry married Susannah Gunstone, albeit in his twilight years, he legitamatized his two children. They were able to 'flip'their names around, Henry Slade Gunstone became Henry Gunstone Slade and Lucretia Gunstone became Lucretia Gunstone Slade.

This name switching caused me months of grief trying to track down all these Gunstone Slades. Henry led me a merry dance!

What was particularly confusing for me initially was the marriage certificate of Henry Gunstone Slade. He was entered as Henry Slade, but signed himself Henry Slade Gunstone. He was also named this way in his father's will . I found it incredibaly hard to think that there was another person in the area named Henry Gunstone Slade, and of course there was not. Henry was 'legitimately' able to 'flip' his name around once his father married Susannah Gunstone. When he was left the entire estate, at the expense of his half brothers and sisters, I can only imagine him feeling that there was some poetic justice in the world, perhaps compensation for all the 'father's bastard son' comments.

Our new 'respectable' Henry Gunstone Slade, man of property and money , went off in search of a wife. He found Mary Casswell, daughter of the wealthy gentleman of Trowbridge, Richard Casswell. The perfect match for a young man with every thing to look forward to.

Old Henry did a marvellous thing, he recognised his mistress by marrying her as soon as he was able, he honored his wife, staying with her 'til she died, and he legitiatized' his baseborn children. Its no wonder he was titled - gentleman!

The Gunstone Slade name carries forward for several generations, and so old Henry was honored by his decendants long after his decease,a most fitting tribute!

The will of Henry Slade of Hilperton.

By this my last will and Testament made this twenty fifth day of February in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty one I Henry Slade of Hilperton Marsh within the parish of Hilperton in the county of Wilts Gentleman do give and dispose of my worldly goods estate and effects in manner following that is to say
In the first place I give unto my sons James Stephen and William Slade the sum of twenty pounds each.

Also I give unto my daughters Eleanor, Ann, Lydia and Jane the sum of twenty pounds each and to my daughter Grace the sum of ten pounds which several legacys before mentioned I direct shall be paid them by my executrix herinafter named in twelve months after my decease but in any case any or either of my said sons or daughters shall happen to dye before his her legacy or legacys shall become due or payable then I direct and it is my will that the legacy or  legacys of him her or them dying shall go and be paid unto and equally amongst the survivors of them.

Also I give devise and bequeath unto my loving wife Susannah all my freehold and Leasehold Estate of what nature or kind soever and wheresoever situate and being and whereof I shall dye seized or possessed either in possession or Reversion for and during her natural life and from and after her decease I give and devise and bequeath the same an d every part thereof unto Henry Slade Gunstone his heirs and assigns for ever in case he shall be then living, but in case he shall happen to dyein the lifetime of my said wife I then give devise and bequeath the same from the death of my said wife unto Lucretia Gunstone  her Heirs and assigns forever.

Also I give unto Lucretia Gunstone the sum of five hundred pounds in case the said Henry Slade Gunstone her brother shall happen to survive my said wife and be possessed of my aforesaid freehold and leasehold estates which sum  I direct shall be by him paid unto her in one year next after his so coming into the possession thereof and I do hereby charge and make subject my said freeholdand leasehold estates with the payment thereof and lastly all the rest residue and remainder of my goods chattles estate and effects whereof I shall dye seized or possessed and not hereinbefore given or disposed of I give devise and bequeath the same and every part therof after payment of my debts legacys and funeral expenses unto my loving wife Susannah and to her heirs **** **** and assigns respectively.
And I do hereby constitute and appoint my said wife Susannah sole Executrix of this my last will and testament hereby revoking all former wills by me at any time heretofore made, And I do hereby devise my wife do bury my at Hilperton in the same Grave where my late father is interred.

In witness whereof I have to this my last will and testament containing two sheets of paper to the first whereof I have set my hand and to the last set my hand and seal the day and year within written

Henry Slade

Signed sealed published and declared
Testator Henry Slade as and for his last will and
Testament in the presence of    John Rudman  Christopher James, S May

At Sarum on the first day of october 1783 Susannah Slade Widow relict the sole executrix above named was duly sworn before me James Evans Surrogate.
58
Washbourn / Re: The Washbournes of Wiltshire
« Last post by Lisa B on December 19, 2019, 04:44:43 pm »
I have been communicating with Roger for sometime is that the tree you speak of? I thought there was something new.
59
Washbourn / The Washbournes of Wiltshire
« Last post by Michael Caswell on December 18, 2019, 08:06:59 pm »
60
Washbourn / Re: Washbourn
« Last post by Lisa B on December 16, 2019, 07:17:36 pm »
My ancester John Washbourn had a sister Anne who married William Caswell. Mary Caswell Washbourn married John Walter at Yatesbury 31 May 1781 brother of Johns wife Susannah Walter so there is a bit of a tie up here.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10